![]() |
||
This snapshot is taken from our new 400-page reference text, The Request For Proposal Handbook (Third Edition). This book focuses on best RFP practices that will help you be successful. Chapter 8 of The Request For Proposal Handbook (Third Edition) discusses the nine building blocks of the evaluation process.
Hear what the President of NASPO says about this book . . . “Michael Asner's book removes a lot of the RFP process mystery. It is one of very few RFP books that address the negotiation process. I refer to Mr. Asner's book often and it is recommended reading for public procurement officers.”
In reviewing a large number of RFPs, we identified nine different components of the process, such as reviewing a proposal for compliance with mandatory requirements, or interviewing the suppliers. We refer to each of these components as a building block: Establishing Compliance with Mandatory Requirements Scoring the Proposals http://www.rfpmentor.com/buildingblock2.html http://www.rfpmentor.com/buildingblock2b.html Imposing Upset Levels Evaluating the Cost Developing a Short-List Interviewing Suppliers Negotiating the Contract Requesting Best and Final Offers Checking References IMPOSING UPSET LEVELS
An upset level is a minimum score that is required to remain in the competition. It is also known as a threshold score. The RFP announces that an upset level will be used and identifies those factors that will be affected. Many RFPs identify the specific value required. “Proposals receiving less than five out of ten on Project Plan will be eliminated from further consideration.” Upset levels may be applied to one evaluation criteria, a group of factors, or the total score. One Evaluation Factor Upset levels are used to eliminate the possibility of a proposal obtaining the most points overall when it has serious deficiencies in one or more categories. It is quite possible that a proposal could receive very high marks in several categories and few in a critical area and still win the competition. Suppose that 40 evaluation points are available for the technical response. An upset level of 20 would indicate that regardless of the scores in other categories, no proposal will be accepted with a score of only 20 in this area. Sometimes, a critical component, such as Project Plan, is only assigned a few points, say 10 out of 100. Applying an upset level of 7 out of 10 to this factor will ensure that proponents understand its importance. A Group of Factors Upset levels ensure that a proposal with an unacceptably low score in one category, such as Management, consisting of Experience, Staff, Training, etc., cannot win the competition. The best practice is to announce in the RFP that "Proposals must obtain 50 out or 75 points for Management to be considered acceptable. Proposals with fewer points will be eliminated from further consideration." Care must be taken in setting upset levels. If you assign an upset level to each evaluation criterion or group, review these levels carefully before issuing the RFP. Otherwise, you may find that you have published the upset levels (and therefore cannot change them) and every proposal has failed to meet at least one minimum score. The Entire Score Upset levels can be applied to the entire score. Proposals obtaining less than 75% of the total available points will be eliminated from further consideration. This strategy ensures that only proposals judged as being “very good” will be considered.
The entire 400-page book focuses on how to create effective, low-risk RFPs. You will learn about best practices that will help you be successful.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Institute
Home | Order | SOW Training CD | Demystified CD | Six-Pack CD | Licenses | Biographies | Evaluation CD Michael Asner Consulting
Home | Order | RFP Report | Products | Contact | About Michael Asner Fairness Officer
Home | Fairness Articles | Fairness Scandals | RFP's/RFQ's | Fairness Consultants | Ethics | Elected Officials Guide
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||