Michael Asner RFP, Request For Proposal Handbook, Books, Newsletters & Articles
 
   

 Michael Asner Consulting

 

michael@rfpmentor.com

 

  

This article is from Issue #49 of The RFP Report. The entire report can be found at:

 

http://www.rfpmentor.com/rfp-report.html

 

 

Two Great RFP Manuals

 

By Michael Asner

 

There are hundreds, possibly thousands, of publications dealing with RFPs. Many large entities such as federal agencies and state governments publish handbooks, guidelines or manuals about RFPs. Some of these publications are excellent – providing many different types of information and advice in a variety of formats.

 

In Issue #48, we identified three of these manuals. In this issue, we deal with the remaining two Best RFP Manuals. The basis of selection was simply the level of usefulness. Over the last ten years, I’ve give dozens of workshops on RFP-topics. In developing the material, I have spent hundreds of hours reviewing RFP manuals and publications. Of all the manuals I have encountered, these are the five that I reference first. These manuals have served as a source of material and examples for me and the participants. They reflect the efforts and experience of their authors and the commitment of their sponsors to this task.

 

 

No.

 

 

Agency/Entity

 

Title/URL

 

1.

 

Purchasing Division

General Services Department

State of New Mexico

 

Request for Proposals Procurement Guide

 

http://www.state.nm.us/spd/rfpguide.pdf

 

2.

 

New York State

Procurement Services Group

 

 

Procurement Guidelines

 

http://www.ogs.state.ny.us/procurecounc/default.asp

 

3.

 

Federal Transit Administration

U.S. Department of Transportation

 

 

Best Practices Procurement Manual

 

http://www.fta.dot.gov/library/admin/BPPM/toc.html

 

4.

 

The Commonwealth of

 Massachusetts

Operations Services Division

 

Procurement Policies and Procedures Handbook

 

http://mass.gov/agency/documents/osd/policy/phand.pdf

 

5.

 

General Services Division

Department of Administration

State of Montana

 

 

Initiating and Navigating the Request for Proposal Process

 

http://www.discoveringmontana.com/doa/gsd/content//Downloads/RFPmanual2003.doc

 

 

MASSACHUSETTS: PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES HANDBOOK

 

Massachusetts has been very active in procurement reform. In April, 1996, new regulations were promulgated which dramatically changed the focus and execution of procurement-related activities.

 

These regulations introduced a single solicitation concept called the Request For Response (RFR), “the mechanism used to communicate contract performance specifications to potential bidders.” This RFR replaces a variety of procurement instruments including RFPs, Invitation To Bid, Request For Quotation and others.

 

The regulations were developed around nine principles developed by customers:

 

 

PROCUREMENT PRINCIPLES - BEST VALUE

 

801 CMR 21.00 empowers departments to procure commodities and services at the “best value” for the department and the Commonwealth. Departments may pursue procurements that achieve a balance of interests and offer the best “deal” or “value” by developing solicitation evaluation criteria that measure factors beyond cost. A procurement is considered in the best interest of the Commonwealth (providing the best value) when it balances the nine guiding principles of procurement.

 

A best value procurement:

  • Supports the achievement of required performance outcomes;
  • Generates the best quality and economic value;
  • Is timely;
  • Minimizes the burden on administrative resources;
  • Expedites simple purchases;
  • Allows flexibility in developing alternative procurement and business relationships;
  • Encourages competition;
  • Encourages the participation of quality vendors; and
  • Supports Commonwealth and department procurement planning.

 

 

This 341-page book deals with the entire procurement process and is a source of lots of good information, not only about RFPs, but about negotiations and contract administration.

 

Chapter 4 of the Handbook contains 38 pages describing the process for drafting an RFP. While discussion of the entire handbook, or even major sections, is beyond the scope of this section, there are features which provide value when considering your RFP process:

 

  • The Handbook provides specific “how to” information, easily understood guidance for specific situations. For example, here is what is says about Sole Source Procurements:

 

 

 

WHAT ABOUT “SOLE SOURCE” PROCUREMENTS?

 

“Sole source” procurements are unpopular with contractors, except the contractor being granted the sole source contract, and counterproductive for departments because they eliminate competition and the “pool” from which departments select quality contractors. This prevents qualified contractors, including small, minority or women owned businesses and businesses owned by individuals with disabilities from competing for Commonwealth contracts.

 

801 CMR 21.00 does not recognize sole source procurements. Although sole-source procurements have been successfully implemented in other procurement markets, past practice has indicated that this exception was subject to abuse, and was often used as a last resort, “last minute” method to procure contracts.

Sole source contracts do not promote the defined procurement principles. The publication of a Request for Response (RFR) is an excellent and quick way to solicit responses from potential qualified bidders who may not be immediately apparent or known to the department.

 

The concept of open and fair public competitive procurement is designed to provide a broad “opportunity” for bidders to compete for Commonwealth contracts. The only way to guarantee this opportunity is adequately furnished is to ensure that at least some method of competitive procurement is used to solicit a reasonable number of qualified bidders.

 

The goal of competitive procurement is to supply the department with a group or “pool” of the most qualified bidders to provide the best quality of contract commodities or services at the least or most reasonable cost to the Commonwealth. This is especially relevant given the competitive economic climate, the reduction of many department appropriations, and the Commonwealth’s commitment to the cost-effective provision of governmental services.

 

 

 

 

It is also foreseeable that certain bidders may be the only bidders that appear to be available or authorized to provide a commodity or service. Unique licensing restrictions or training requirements may limit the availability of qualified bidders.

 

For example, a contractor may sometimes restrict maintenance services on lease equipment to only licensed repairmen of the contractor. In other situations, the majority of qualified bidders reside out of state, and contracting for certain commodities or services would be inefficient or costly.

 

Even in these situations, where there appears to be no other qualified bidders, a department must attempt at least some form of verification. If the RFR elicits only one response the department may proceed with a contract. If additional qualified bidders respond to the RFR, then the basis for a competitive procurement is established. A new competitive procurement will be necessary at the end of this contract, since there is no guarantee that other equally or more qualified bidders have not entered the competitive marketplace since the contract was first awarded.

 

 

  • The Handbook defines the minimum content of a solicitation document.

 

 

LISTING OF MINIMUM CONTENTS OF A REQUEST FOR RESPONSE (RFR)

 

This section identifies the minimum information constituting an RFR, including:

 

1. Description or purpose of the procurement

2. Acquisition method (fee-for-service, outright purchase, rental, term lease, Tax Exempt Lease-Purchase or license)

3. Request for single or multiple contractors

4. Use of a procurement by a single or multiple departments

5. Anticipated duration of contract including renewal options

6. Anticipated expenditures and compensation structures

7. Performance and contract specifications

8. Instructions for submission of responses

9. Deadline for responses and procurement calendar

10. RFR attachments/required specifications

 

 

  • The Handbook contains items rarely dealt with in similar publications. Most handbooks identify the Table of Contents of the RFR or RFP. However, they are usually lacking in reasons for inclusion of certain words or items. The Handbook doesn’t simply present the list of minimum requirements for an RFR. It contains a 20-page discussion of the topic. Each requirement, such as “evaluation criteria” is discussed at the “how to” level:

 

 

Considerations that are not included in the RFR may not be used in the selection or ranking of a bidder. For example, if bidders will receive additional credit or will be ranked higher for offering a Boston regional office location, having certain national accreditation, or meeting the unique linguistic and cultural needs of the consumers, these criteria should be included as part of the RFR so that bidders know they have the opportunity for additional points or a higher rank if they offer these options. Conversely, if this information was not requested in the RFR, bidders who failed to offer these options may not be penalized.

 

 

  • The Handbook contains extensive attachments to improve its value as a definitive source of procurement information for an agency:

 

 

APPENDICES

 

801 CMR 21.00: Procurement of Commodities or Services, Including Human and Social Services

808 CMR 1.00: Compliance, Reporting and Auditing for Human and Social Services

 

FORMS – CONTRACT

 

Request for Verification of Taxation Reporting Information

Commonwealth Terms and Conditions

Commonwealth Terms and Conditions for Human and Social Services

Standard Contract Form

Standard Contract Amendment Form

Purchase of Service Attachments

Change in Contractor Identity Form

Equipment/Services Confirmation Form

Contract Review Form

 

FORMS - RFR ATTACHMENTS/OTHER

 

Additional Environmentally Preferable Product Information

Affirmative Action Plan Form

Authorization for Electronic Funds Payment  Business Reference Form

Consultant Contractor Mandatory Submission Form

Contractor Authorized Signature Verification Form 

Northern Ireland Notice and Certification

RFR - Optional Specifications

RFR - Required Specifications

Sample Reference Review Form

Sample Response Evaluation Scorecard

Tax Compliance Certification Instructions

 

OTHER PROCUREMENT INFORMATION

Acquisition of Durable Commodities

Analyzing a Financial Statement

Environmentally Preferable Products Program

Guidelines on Material Changes in a Contractor’s Identity

Incidental Purchasing Quick Reference Guide

Performance Contracting

Procurement Groups

Procurement Group to Object Code Crosswalk

Purchase of Service Budget Attachments - Fiscal Specifications 

Purchase of Service (POS) Capital Items Procurement Policy

Request for Response (RFR) Checklist

Request for Response/Contract Duration

Use of a Procurement by a Single or Multiple Departments

 

 

  • The Handbook identifies all of the items necessary to audit the entire process and each major decision. It provides an extensive list of the times to be archived in the procurement file:

 

 

The following is a listing of some of the most common items that should be contained in a procurement file (if applicable) at the completion of the process:

 

·         The four components of the contract:

 

·         Standard Contract Form (executed) - Original or certified copy with applicable attachments, amendments and other negotiated items. Note: if the record copy is on file at the Office of the Comptroller or at OSD, the procurement file must contain a copy. See Chapter 5 for further guidance in this area.

 

·         Copy of Commonwealth Terms and Conditions (applicable version) or verification that this form has been filed on the MMARS Vendor File.

 

·         Request for Response (including all applicable attachments). This requirement is met by either a hard copy of the RFR or, if the RFR was posted on Comm-PASS, a screen print of the Comm-PASS closed solicitations summary page verifying the location of the RFR (including the RFR Reference Number) on Comm-PASS.

 

·         Selected bidder’s response (including any negotiated items and additional conditions)

 

·         Notes, minutes or other related materials generated during the RFR development and selection process.

 

·         Record keeping related to purchase and use of Environmentally Preferable Products.

 

·         Copies of written questions and answers provided by the PMT.

 

·         List or sign-in sheet at bidder’s conference (if offered).

 

·         Notification list (if applicable).

 

·         Any correspondence to and from bidders distributed manually or posted on Comm-PASS.

 

·         Evaluation criteria and any amendments (with reasons for the amendments).

 

·         Responses from non-selected bidders.

 

·         Notes from bidder presentations and demonstrations.

 

·         Notification of contract execution.

 

·         Completed evaluation forms and any minutes or notes from evaluation committee meetings.

 

·         Contractor Authorized Signature Verification Form (large procurements).

 

·         Affirmative Action Plan or Form (large procurements).

 

·         Clarification documents (if required).

 

·         Reference checks.

 

·         Recommendation for selected bidder(s).

 

·         Requests for and any correspondence resulting from any debriefing requests.

 

MONTANA: INITIATING AND NAVIGATING THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL PROCESS

 

Montana has developed a 50-page RFP Manual that is easy to read and covers the entire process. This manual can be readily adapted for other, relatively small, jurisdictions.

 

Some of the features which make this a good model include the following:

 

  • The first page of the document emphasizes the role of procurement people as “guardians of public trust”.

 

  • The document is easy to navigate with important definitions and concepts highlighted in “boxes”:

 

 

WHAT ARE EVALUATION CRITERIA?

 

Evaluation criteria are the factors an agency uses to determine which of several competing proposals submitted in response to an RFP would best meet the agency’s needs. In establishing effective evaluation criteria, an agency must clearly identify the factors relevant to its selection of a contractor and then prioritize or weigh these factors according to their importance in satisfying the agency’s needs in the procurement. Together, the proper identification and weighing of the evaluation criteria will form an evaluation plan that will provide the agency with a common standard by which to judge the merit of competing proposals. This allows the agency to rank the proposals received while simultaneously providing offerors with a fair basis for comparison. As importantly, when evaluation criteria are properly selected and weighed, the proposals received will accurately reflect the offeror’s understanding of the solicitation and the offeror’s ability to deliver what the agency needs.

 

 

  • The RFP Process is described in 16 pages of text which corresponds to the table in Chapter 3.

 

  • There is a separate section dealing with scoring price using ratio method, best value method, and two-step method.

 

  • There are three templates included: one for general use, one for smaller projects, and one for Information Technology.

 

In addition to the manual, their RFP site contains a number of useful forms and templates:

 

Document Name

Agency RFP Checklist

Contractor Assessment Program Template

Offeror's RFP Checklist

RFP Contract

RFP Cost Evaluation Methods

RFP Evaluation Process - Instructions

RFP Flowchart

RFP Manual (50 pages)

RFP Process Information

RFP Process Q & As

RFP Reference Check

RFP Sample Scoring Guide

RFP Standard Statements

RFP Template 2004

RFP Short Form Template 2004

IT RFP Contract

IT RFP Template 2004

 

GET YOUR FREE COPY OF OUR 16 PAGE RFP REPORT

"Scandals Promote Procurement Reform. Includes a report that identifies the most common and most significant procurement risks"

Free newsletters, RFP Secrets and Articles.

First Name

Email Address

The Institute

Home | Order | SOW Training CD | Demystified CD | Six-Pack CD | Licenses | Biographies | Evaluation CD

Michael Asner Consulting

Home | Order | RFP Report | Products | Contact | About Michael Asner
 
Fairness Officer

Home | Fairness Articles | Fairness Scandals | RFP's/RFQ's | Fairness Consultants | Ethics | Elected Officials Guide
 


Site Map | Disclaimer | Customer Service Privacy Policy | Refund Policy | Deliver / Shipping

 

Michael Asner RFP Consulting

For product inquiries, call 1-866-822-7256
or send an email to: michael@rfpmentor.com